今日早报报导，前段时间持续多日的大雨，造成钱塘江上游不得不开闸泄洪。由此，大量的垃圾卷入江水中，顺势漂到闻堰沿江一带。夹杂在垃圾中的还有不少已经死掉的鸡、鸭、鹅，甚至出现了几百斤重的死猪。

在闻堰码头附近清理垃圾的工人称，3月9日至17日，钱塘江五桥到城市阳台水域已打捞起死猪尸体约550头，其中最多的一天捞上来近百头死猪，是5年来最多的一次。

不仅如此，以前钱塘江出现死猪大多都是夏天的七八月份，而今年春天突发大水，江面上死猪的现象也提前了好几个月。“这种腐烂的死猪味道很难闻，特别刺鼻，大家都忍着恶臭进行打捞。”工人们说。

担心水质受到影响

钱塘江是杭州主要的用水来源，从五桥到城市阳台，就有取水口三四个。死猪和家禽尸体的出现是否会对饮用水水质带来影响呢？

钱塘江海塘物业管理有限公司的管理人员黄海珍说，最近几天，工作人员都在集中精力打捞死猪和垃圾。不过，因为打捞及时，垃圾和死猪还没有漂到取水口附近，现在的动物尸体也越来越少，因此不会对饮用水源带来影响。

对此有不少网友质疑：“这么多死猪没有对水质造成影响？看来我们又被‘和谐了’”还有网友写道：“‘垃圾和死猪还没有漂到取水口附近’难道只有‘漂到取水口附 近’才会污染吗？垃圾和死猪在水中有分界线吗？这不是骗人吗？”

死猪来源仍不明朗

为弄清死猪的来源，有关工作人员驱车到上游查找。沿江一带分布着一些养殖户，但一路问过去，一直到富春江闸道口，都没有问出个所以然来。

他们到达富春江时，还能看到江面上漂浮着不少死猪。如果富春江开闸泄洪，这些死猪肯定还会随江水漂流到钱塘江。

闻堰码头有个卖水产的小市场。附近的居民程先生说：“我们也记不清从哪一年开始，反正不止三年五年了，年年夏天都会从上游漂来大量的死猪。但这些死猪究竟是从哪个地方漂来的，大家都不清楚。这些猪是淹死的还是病死的，更无从得知了。”

另外一名前来买水产品的居民洪大姐说：“以前，每到夏天我们家肯定不吃鲶鱼，现在看来春天就不能吃了。”原因是鲶鱼会吃死猪。

“如果这些猪确实因大水淹没猪场，猪的主人无法控制，这样我们还可以理解，甚至很同情。但是，假设这些猪是病死，有人故意投放到江里，我们希望他们应该考虑到更多人的安全，别再干缺德的事了。同时，我们也希望相关部门能加大对死猪现象的管理力度，毕竟大家的安全才是最重要的。”沿江的居民们说。

Hundreds of Pig Carcasses Contaminate Water Source for 4 Million People

Epoch Times Staff Created: Mar 23, 2010 Last Updated: Mar 23, 2010

Facebook Digg del.icio.us StumbleUpon | |
Related articles: China > Society

An estimated 550 dead pigs have been retrieved at the lower reaches of the Qiantang River, the water source for four million residents of Hangzhou, the capital of eastern China’s Zhejiang Province. No one knows if they drowned or died from disease.

Morning News Today reported on March 17 that flooding at the upper reaches of the river had washed down a lot of garbage along with dead chickens, ducks, geese, and even pigs weighing up to several hundred pounds.

A workman in Wenyan, a town near Hangzhou, said he hadn’t seen anything like this in the last five years. “These dead pigs gave off a most noxious smell.” He said they were removing up to 100 pig carcasses a day between March 9 and March 17.

River manager Huang Haizhen said, “Fortunately these bodies were not floating close to the intakes of surface drinking water. Thus the water was not polluted.”

Some internet users questioned his point. “Wasn't the presence of so many dead pigs in itself polluting the water?” and “Only the corpses drifting close to drinking water intakes would contaminate the water?”

Morning News Today reporters checked with some local pig farmers along the rivers trying to find where the dead pigs came from.

They found some dead pigs still floating in one of the upper reaches known as the Fuchun River. These corpses would follow the flood, eventually ending up in the Qiantang River.

Mr. Chen, a local resident in the town of Wenyan said, “We don’t know when it began, maybe three to five years ago, but every summer a lot of dead pigs would be found floating in the river. Nobody would tell us where they came from.”

Mr. Jiang, another resident said: “I know many people living along the river throw their garbage directly into the river. That might be the reason.”

No one had an answer for why so many carcasses appeared at this time.

Read the original Chinese article.

 

 

http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/content/view/31888/

 

央企被认为国民经济的中流砥柱。按照中共以及国资委的部署，央企已明确主要集中在军工、电网电力、石油石化、电信、煤炭、民航、航运等七大行业。

北京仁达房地产评估有限公司的一份报告显示，2009年以来的土地市场表现出最大特点为“国进民退”——有国企背景的企业纷纷踏入土地市场，并将多块地王 “收入囊中”。根据国资委的数据统计，目前127家中央企业中，涉足房地产行业的达94家，比例超过七成。其中，除16家主业中包括“房地产开发与经营”，其余78家均属于“不务正业”。

在当前价格快速飙升的房地产市场上，央企大肆“攻城掠地”已成为房价高涨的重要推手。央企背靠国家信用，具有一般企业无法享受的政策和信贷资源。在同等竞争的条件下，央企比民企更有先天优势和资金底气，民企无法与其平等竞争。同时，央企不计成本的投资终将隐患重重，一旦市场出现变化，损失要靠国家买单。

按照国资委要求，这78户企业正在调整重组，在完成自有土地开发和已实施项目等阶段性工作后退出房地产业务。但国资委并没有透露具体的退出安排和时间表，市场和百姓期待实实在在的效果，更关注“能否退出”和“如何退出”。

“地王”频出“凶猛”央企一天包办三
　　
北京仁达房地产评估有限公司的一份报告显示，2009年以来的土地市场表现出最大特点为“国进民退”——有央企背景的企业纷纷踏入土地市场，并将多块地王“收入囊中”。

尽管调控政策频频出台，各级政府官员不断地坚定表态，但似乎仍然勒不住房价继续上涨的缰绳。一边是国家调控房价政策密集出台，《政府工作报告》明确要求“抑制土地价格过快上涨”，一边是北京一天诞生三“地王”。

3月15日，两会闭幕的第二天，北京市统计局公布数据显示，今年1—2月，北京市四环路内商品住宅期房均价首次突破3万元/平方米，六环路外的房价也首次突破万元大关。
　　
同一天上午，北京大望京地块和亦庄地块分别以27,529元/平方米的楼面价格、52.4亿元的土地总价，刷新北京土地成交纪录，成为新的“单价地王”和 “总价地王”。但仅仅6个小时以后，“单价地王”就被下午竞价的东升乡蓟门桥地块夺走，该地块的实际楼面价格超过3万元/平方米。当日的三个“地王”全部为“央企制造”，分别为中信集团和中国兵器装备总公司旗下的房地产公司以及远洋地产。北京当天成交6块土地，总金额达143.5亿
　　
17日，北京大望京村4号、5号地再次引得远洋、保利、华润、首开等国字头背景的房企悉数到场，众多民营房企的“观摩”透露着无奈。金地一位工作人员在竞拍结束后难掩失落：“资金等方面的高门槛，使我们根本竞争不过央企。”更多到场的民营房企则不愿多言。

烟企也来楼市淘金
　　
值得注意的是，中国兵器装备集团、中国烟草总公司这样的非房地产主业央企也杀入地产领域。中国烟草集团在竞拍大望京村一号地时，虽然仅一步之差，被远洋地产挫于马下。
　　
中经联盟秘书长陈云峰表示非常担心，“这意味着土地市场太乱了，一般房地产企业都很难敌得过资金雄厚的央企，更何况现在连非房地产主业的央企也杀了进来。他们对地价推动的力度很难控制。”
　　
北京易居房地产研究所副所长牟增彬认为为，非房地产企业也扎堆出现在土地竞拍现场，只能说明房地产行业的利润率太可观了，毕竟，“对企业而言，哪个行业赚钱做哪个”。

普通购房者“就这样被抛弃”

许多普通购房者原本认为房价会在本轮调控中稳定甚至有所回调，而创纪录的房价和地价却让他们再度感到焦虑和恐慌。

根据北京市统计局最新公布的数据，今年1—2月，北京六环外期房均价首次突破万元大关，达到10,409元/平方米。同期，北京城镇居民人均可支配收入头两个月共为5,335元。据此推算，一个普通的两口之家年收入大约6万元左右，按照目前的价格要在六环外买一套90平方米的住房，不吃不喝需要15年左右的时间。

这意味着，大多数中低收入家庭甚至中等收入家庭已经很难在六环内买房置业，他们几乎已经被北京的高房价“抛弃”。

为何“地王”大都由“央企制造”？

为何“地王”大都由“央企制造”？中国现代国际关系研究院经济安全研究中心主任江涌认为，央企拿地是因为自身创造利润压力太大。“目前国内实体经济疲弱，微观经营环境恶劣。在这种情况下，把钱投入虚拟经济比如股市、楼市比投入实体经济风险要小一些，而且更容易获得利润。”

署名马光远的博客文章详细指出：其一，这些国字头的企业依靠强大的势力，更容易获取信贷资源，在投资实业盈利微薄的情况下，他们将银行的信贷资金转向暴利的房地产；

其二，这些央企主业的盈利状况差强人意。2009年，128家中央企业的利润近8千亿元，但如从利润分布看，约前40家央企利润占全部利润的95%；前10 家企业的利润占到全部利润的75%以上，而排名靠前的央企，差不多都是垄断企业。也就是说，尽管央企利润总额庞大，但总体看，除垄断企业之外，绝大多数央企的主业是不赚钱的，他们需要房地产这个暴利行业来粉饰利润。以中建集团为例，房地产虽不是其主业，但利润贡献率达到了40%以上；

其三，一些企业的巨大垄断利润并未上交，而是被企业留存，但留存的利润并没有用于发展主业，而是拿去投资利润丰厚的房地产。

署名韩令国的博客文章指出，这一轮调控政策并没有银行的房贷限制配合，无法从根本上调控房地产市场，只是能保障房地产市场趋于稳定，确保房价不会大幅下跌而已，而地方政府正是利用这点来协同国企、央企进行利益输送。国有企业与地方政府之间的权利和利益交换，就是央企制造地王的根本原因。

专家警言分析

“地王”频繁再现，说明许多炒家仍预期未来房价会节节攀升。当空手入市的人占大幅比例时，也是房市泡沫破裂的开端。福州大学房地产研究所所长王阿忠指出，在 “地王”身上有四重危机值得警觉：强烈的地价连锁反应、引发房价再度暴涨、资本过度向房地产业聚集、房价背离民生所引起的社会不安。

《财经》特约经济学家谢国忠表示，中国经济看起来很繁荣但不是因为4万亿元人民币的经济扶持政策，而是增加的10万亿元人民币贷款额流向了房地产市场。在依靠房地产领域的非生产性增长的情况下，如果2012年提高利率并出现全球流动性枯竭现象中国经济将会大幅下滑。

Banning SOE Real Estate Investment to Impact the Soaring Price of Housing: An Analysis

By Li Ying
Epoch Times Staff Created: Mar 23, 2010 Last Updated: Mar 23, 2010

Facebook Digg del.icio.us StumbleUpon | |
Related articles: China > Business & Economy

A land auction in Beijing on March 8. (The Epoch Times Archive )

As if to embarrass Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao who just promised to bring housing prices down in a March 5 National People's Congress session, Beijing’s residential land-price record was broken twice within six hours on March 15, each by state-owned enterprises (SOEs).

Three days later the State-Owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission, a State Council agency, announced that 78 SOEs will be banned from making further investments in real estate. According to the commission, 94 out of 127 SOEs have been investing in residential real estate development while only 16 SOEs’ primary business is related to real estate. The other 78 SOEs, the commission said, will be required to cease investing in real estate upon the completion of their current real estate projects. No agenda was provided.

The ban seems to reflect the central government’s decision to curb the soaring price of housing, as the SOEs have played a major role in pumping up land prices in the past few years. However, experts have criticized such measures as superficial and ineffective.

Ren Zhiqiang, president of Huayuan Corp., one of China’s largest real estate developers, said in a recent interview with Economic Information Daily that the 78 banned SOEs have no significant influence in the real estate sector. “The other 16 are the real dominating force,” Ren said. “Ruling out a few SOEs will not solve the major problem and will not stop SOEs from paying sky-high prices for land.”

Ren’s remarks were echoed by Pan Shiyi, founder and chairman of Soho China, Beijing’s largest real estate developer. Pan said it is very difficult to ban businesses from purchasing land through administrative measures. Some non-real estate focused SOEs have formed joint ventures, and that makes it more difficult to control their investment behaviors, Pan said.

In recent years SOEs have been aggressively dominating China’s real estate sector. Since 2009, most records in residential housing prices have been set by SOEs. Private developers are more and more frequently shut out of the auctions by the high-price offerings of SOEs. The majority of the non-real estate sector SOEs, such as weapon and tobacco manufacturers, have also joined the game.

Analysts have attributed the SOEs’ active involvement in real estate development to three main factors: easy access to financial resources, pressure for high revenues in their own companies, and unparalleled profit levels in the real estate sector.

China’s financial policy has given SOEs many privileges. Compared to other companies, SOEs can easily obtain more loans and cheaper loans. In the past few years a large portion of loans have flown to the real estate market.

Chinese economist Jiang Yong explained this phenomenon. “Now China’s domestic demand is weak, and the micro-level business environment is harsh. Under such circumstances, it is less risky and more profitable to invest in a fictitious economy—like the stock market or real estate—than in the real economy.”

On the other hand, with the exception of a few monopolies, the SOEs have been struggling to break even. In 2009, the top 40 out of 128 SOEs contributed to 95 percent of the total SOE revenue, while the top 10 contributed more than 75 percent of the revenue. The top SOEs consist mainly of monopolies. Therefore, most SOEs need the steep profits from the real estate market to make their financial numbers look pretty. For example, the China State Construction Engineering Corp. obtains over 40 percent of its revenue from real estate development, though real estate is not its official primary business, according to an analysis by economist Ma Guangyuan.

Moreover, SOEs have little concern over investment risks because any loss will be covered by the nation’s tax money.

If the Chinese government does not directly address the root causes of the SOEs’ over-investment in real estate and only uses symbolic actions to gesture their willingness to reform, the problem of soaring housing prices will only get worse and lead to more serious problems.

Experts have warned that such an abnormal economic phenomenon will render the country’s economy vulnerable. As real estate market expert Prof. Wang Azhong pointed out, four potential crises are associated with the high price of real estate: the chain effect in the real estate market that will further boost land prices; a new wave of housing price increases; an over-concentration of capital in the real estate sector; and the social instability caused by unaffordable housing prices.

Read the original Chinese article.

http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/content/view/31910/

根据王克勤的报导，最早发现疫苗有问题是在07年的3、4月份，而造成疫苗出现问题的根本原因是官商合谋垄断疫苗市场，造成储存运输上的环节上出现了严重问题，特别是高温曝露，导致疫苗变质。曾经身为山西省疾控中心信息科的科长陈涛安，在发现了疫苗出问题后，向有关部门举报了30多次，而只有太原检察院做了认真的调查，但最终被搁浅，其它地方则根本不管。据陈涛安讲，在他努力揭开山西疫苗黑幕的过程中也被抓过和关过。

想一想，从07年到现在，有多少孩子打了毒疫苗？又有多少孩子成为受害者却不知原因何在？为何披露疫苗问题的陈涛安却被抓被关？为何山西省疾控中心不避嫌疑，参与患儿的医学鉴定？法院为何多患儿家长的起诉不闻不问？经营疫苗的华为公司到底有无经销疫苗的资格？

对于上述疑问，山西省相关部门都避而不谈，而山西省卫生厅则回应道：国家食品药品监督管理局此前曾对山西接种点库存疫苗抽取样品进行委托检验，检验结果均符合国家规定。目前，山西省未接到因注射疫苗出现聚集性异常反应的报告。为何在大量的事实面前，山西省卫生厅依然是如此“泰然自若”？受害者家长们真的能讨回公道吗？

如果看看中共政府如何处理曾经的“毒奶粉事件”和“四川地震豆腐渣工程”事件，我们就可以理解为何山西省卫生厅敢罔顾事实，为何受害者家长们奔波几年却毫无结果，而且讨回公道的希望将是十分渺茫。

很多人都不会忘记，2008年四川汶川大地震，由于建筑商们的偷工减料，致使近2万孩子在豆腐渣的教学楼内遇难，留给家人的是无尽的血泪和痛不欲生的日子。当家长们想为孩子们讨个说法时，却四处上告无门，而且行踪、电话被监视，不允许他们向外界披露真相。帮助灾民调查真相的艾未未被打，谭作人被判刑，无数人的愤怒被压在心底。而当局只有一个目的，就是消去一切不和谐的声音。

再看看当局对造成无数婴幼儿危害的毒奶粉的处理。三鹿集团董事长被判了，几个在牛奶中掺入三聚氰胺的奶农被判了，而中共的质检官员有哪个承担了法律责任？判完了所谓的“祸首”，糊弄了下老百姓，中共的作秀就此结束，而对于患儿的赔偿再无了下文。企业不赔偿，国家不赔偿，“你再闹，再闹，就抓你！”锲而不舍为众多结石宝宝讨公道的“结石宝宝之父”赵连海被抓、被判刑就是当局杀一儆百的铁证。

如今，毒疫苗事件被披露。与毒奶粉、豆腐渣工程相类似的，这又是一起官商勾结戕害中国老百姓的恶性事件。善良的老百姓期望行恶者还自己一个公道，当然是天方夜谭。前车之鉴不远矣。充其量，中共当局为了平息民怨，将贩售疫苗的华为公司作为替罪羊抛出，但与其勾结的某些身在卫生厅、卫生局、教育局等相关部门、甚至中央某些部门的官员，则一定安然无事。因为牵一发动全身，中共还得靠这些丧尽天良的官员们维持自己的专制统治。

那么，身受毒疫苗之害的家长们该怎么办？心怀善良愿望的王克勤等民众怎么办？惟一之法是抛弃中共，建立一个真正民主自由的国家。诚如赵连海在退党声明中所言：“共产党祸国殃民这么多年了，我们太多的老百姓，受到了太多的惨无人道的迫害。我们应该以更加坚定的一种态度，来进行表态，今天以真名正式退出中共的所有组织。古人说得好，邪不压正，多行不义必自毙，共产党必将遭到人民的唾弃，必将被人民彻底地抛弃，这是我非常坚定的信念。”

的确，当中共被抛弃之时，我们的苦难才会终结，我们的孩子才不再会受到各种各样的伤害。

(大纪元版权所有，转载请注明出处。)

本文只代表作者的观点和陈述

两会前夕，阳光公益就开始遭到当局的清洗。刘安军被当局强行要求外出旅游。随后在两会期间，当局对阳光公益的多名成员进行大规模地抓捕行动，并带走在刘安军家中的所有阳光公益义工，见一个抓一个。甚至差点带走刘安军的妻子孙女士，一个非阳光公益成员。

据孙女士介绍，正月十五那天，当地的二名警察上门强行要求刘安军外出旅游。当时刘安军告诉他们自己是残疾人士，行走不方便，哪里也不想去，就想待在自己家里，但是对方就是要求他出去散散心，而将他带走了。

刘安军被旅游之后，孙女士有时候还能联系上他，但是自从刘安军13日午夜12点回到北京之后，她就再也没有能联系上他。之前孙女士接到刘安军的电话说他需要换洗衣服，请她把衣服准备好，但后来刘安军一直没有消息。

孙女士透露，3月14日上午10点多，警方从她家带走了义工郑琳、史大雷、黄建春、刘凤琴等四人。只要是阳光公益的，来一个控制一个。甚至警方还想连她一块带走。她说：“好在我机灵，把门关得快，他们不断敲门我没有理睬，他们进不了门也就算了。不然我也被抓走了。”同时他们家的电被故意掐断，令她上不了网，手机也无法工作。

阳光公益帮助缺衣少穿的流浪孤寡老人及访民有限的解决吃穿（阳光公益）

孙女士表示她联系不上刘安军后，就打电话给110，希望他们出面相助。但是110则让她去找丰台区公安分局第一支队，就这样今天推明天。她也曾去询问四个被抓义工的下落，也没有打听到。这几天她自己也一直发高烧。她说：“16日开始已经有电供应了，有暖气了。高烧变低烧了。”

曾有网友披露，网名“大唐”的刘安军“被旅游”到广西阳朔，他曾经向朋友发出呼救电话，但很快又失去联系。

今天据释放回家的刘安军介绍，他在被旅游结束回到北京之后，就一直被关在一家旅社内，并多次遭到警方的盘问，内容都是跟阳光公益有关，包括有没有登记、捐款多少等等问题。他还表示目前为止，阳光公益的义工郑琳还没有任何消息。

据悉，阳光公益是由网友自发成立的一个纯民间公益团队，致力于对流浪孤弱人员及访民的救助。阳光公益在成立后组织了很多公益慈善活动。例如：帮助孤儿以及流浪儿童寻找联系学校，帮助敬老院抚慰老人捐助钱物。帮助缺衣少穿的流浪孤寡老人及访民有限的解决吃穿。阳光公益自成立以来一直受到当局的打压，当局不但百般破坏了除夕时请访民流浪人员吃年夜饭的活动，还藉机将义工带到派出所询问；另外还阻挠元宵节发元宵等活动。

美东时间: 2010-03-17 02:03:10 AM 【万年历】
本文网址: http://www.epochtimes.com/gb/10/3/17/n2848147.htm

Charity Leader Forcefully Detained During 'Two Sessions'

By Luo Ya
Epoch Times Staff Created: Mar 20, 2010 Last Updated: Mar 21, 2010

Facebook Digg del.icio.us StumbleUpon | |
Related articles: China > Regime

The Sunshine Community provides food and clothing to the homeless, the elderly, and petitioners who become stranded in Beijing. (Sunshine Community)

Liu Anjun, a key member of a private volunteer charity known as the Sunshine Community, was released after 17 days of detention when the annual session of the National People’s Congress and the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference concluded.

Mr. Liu was one of several mainland human rights activists who were detained—a routine practice of the communist regime during its annual session of political meetings. Some of those arrested are still reported as missing.

The Sunshine Community helps orphans and homeless children to find schools, raises funds for retirement homes, and provides food and clothing to the homeless, the elderly, and petitioners who become stranded in Beijing.

According to Ms. Sun, Liu’s wife, two policemen visited their home on Feb. 28, demanding that Liu leave Beijing during the time of the meetings. When he refused, stating that his handicap made it difficult for him to travel, the police returned on March 1 to forcefully take him into custody.

Several other Sunshine Community volunteers who were at Liu’s residence were also arrested on March 14, the last day of the communist annual session. One of them is still missing.

Ms. Sun said she was also nearly arrested that day. “Fortunately, I was very alert. I closed the door right after they left the house. They kept knocking on the door, and I simply ignored them,’ she said. However, she realized her electricity, Internet service, and cellular phone services had all been disconnected after they left.

Liu said he was locked away in a motel room where he was constantly interrogated by national security officers about the activities of the Sunshine Community, including its records and donations.

Ms. Sun contacted patrol assistance after her husband was taken. They referred her to the local Public Security Bureau, but they were of little help.

Some online activists reported receiving an SOS message from Liu, but they were unable to establish contact with him.

Since its establishment, the Sunshine Community has been subjected to constant suppression by the communist regime. Recently, local authorities disrupted a Chinese New Year’s Eve dinner for petitioners and detained several of their volunteers for interrogation. A food distribution event during the Lantern Festival was also stopped.

Read the original Chinese article.

 

 

http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/content/view/31744/

 

据悉，2月中下旬，中国央行在全国50个大、中、小城市针对收入、就业、物价、房价等内容进行了城镇储户问卷调查，3月16日发布《2010年第1季度全国城镇储户问卷调查综述》。

调查显示，当前中国居民物价满意指数降至25.9%，比上季再降2.3个百分点。其中认为目前物价“高，难以接受” 的居民比例达到51.0%，这个比例是自1999年调查以来的最高值。

对当前房价水平，有七成以上居民认为“过高，难以接受”，而选择“可以接受”的居民占比27.6%。这是自2009年第2季度以来，城镇居民反映房价过高的比例逐季攀升，各收入水平持此判断的居民普遍增加了一成左右，其中中高收入人群更为突出。

与此调查结果相悖的，还有这样一个数据，就是国家统计局公布的“去年房价上涨1.5%”的数据。全国政协委员王超斌甚至高呼：“绝不可能，这个数据太不负责任，全世界人民都不会相信。”

调查显示，在当前物价和利率水平下，城镇居民的消费意愿明显回落，储蓄和投资意愿则不断加强。有43.6%选择“更多地储蓄存款”，41.2%倾向于“更多地投资（包括购买债券、基金、股票等）”。

分投资方式看，“房地产”投资超越“基金、理财产品”成为城镇居民最普遍的投资方式，24.1%的城镇居民选择进行房地产投资，其次几个比较主要的投资方式依次为“基金、理财产品”22.0%，股票13.5%，债券13.2%，实业投资12.6%。